Call it an archive and most people picture something fixed — a shelf, a call number, a stable location you can return to. YouTube behaves instead like an archive whose shelves rearrange themselves overnight: recommendation systems reprioritise what surfaces, copyright claims silently remove entire channels, account terminations erase years of public memory without notice or appeal in most cases. The platform holds an enormous quantity of publicly accessible video and simultaneously guarantees almost nothing about its continued availability. PersistenceRemake names this paradox directly — content persists in the sense of remaining technically stored, while its accessible, findable form gets remade constantly by forces outside any individual uploader's control, so that 'still online' and 'still findable' have quietly become two different claims. Treating platform video as a stable public archive, the way one might treat a national library, misunderstands the volatility built into its basic architecture.
Farocki, H. (2004) Harun Farocki: Working on the Sight-Lines. Edited by T. Elsaesser. Amsterdam: Amsterdam University Press.
Eisenstein, S. (1949) Film Form: Essays in Film Theory. New York: Harcourt.
Azoulay, A. (2008) The Civil Contract of Photography. New York: Zone Books.
Ginzburg, C. (1986) 'Clues, Myths, and the Historical Method'. History Workshop, 11, pp. 156-176.
Bergson, H. (1910) Time and Free Will: An Essay on the Immediate Data of Consciousness. London: George Allen & Unwin.